Tuesday, December 22, 2009

Why Women Fake Orgasm?

Everybody heard rumours about women faking orgasms. Is that true? The majority of women have faked at least one orgasm, yet some fake almost all of them. Why do they do that? There are many reasons and the case is that there's no one to blame.

The most common are two reasons: they don't want to make their partners feel bad or they are tired and just want to end sex. Most females say that their partners are not satisfied until the girls feels orgasm, there's only one way to make them feel happy and stop the exhausting procedure - fake.

Another reason is that a typical female doesn't seek for orgasm; she desires a sexual relationship only because she wants intimacy. Still, such an attitude may make her partner feel bad. The only way out is to fake it out.

Some women never really experience orgasm while making sex, but they want their partner to feel good about himself and her. Men usually expect women to have pleasure, that's why females have no other choice. They have to fake to have a good relationship.

Loss of interest, having sex only because the partner wants to, also makes women to fake. Most females talk to their friends about such things and while they know other women act it, they do so too, because it's an easier way to have a good relationship.

When a man tries very hard, sometimes even too hard to make his woman have an orgasm, the woman usually finds it better to fake it than to disappoint her partner once again. They fear rejection if a man wouldn't understand her, they don't want to offend men because the absence of an orgasm is actually not their fault.

Some women may have health problems. If, while experiencing she becomes too sensitive and wants to stop, she fakes an orgasm in order to stop and relax. Orgasm may also cause discomfort and pain; that's a serious problem and she can't be blamed for faking. In such cases, most women prefer and enjoy orgasm more during solitary masturbation. Although they feel better while having orgasm themselves, they want to make their partner feel good too, so they act an orgasm out.

A female orgasm can be most easily faked by a good actress. There are few options: gripping something tightly; moaning loudly; breathing deeply; burying face into something (pillow); doing kegels or anything else at least remotely dramatic or climatic.

What to do if you think your partner is faking? Talk about it. Maybe she knows some special position or action that would make her happy. Don't get angry if she admits faking. Try to solve the problem, but don't get too far, don't try too hard because it may become an exhausting activity rather than an act of love.

Women act and men can do nothing about it; and maybe they shouldn't? Try to find out the real reasons of faking and discus possible ways out. Don't blame your partner for it; it's natural for women to do so from time to time. Show her your passion, love and try to understand her. ...

Best ideas for your perfect date

Probably the most superb for your unforgetable date sounds the idea about riding horses in the beach, across the water vawes in the view of sunset on the ocean...if you cant organize all those things keep the idea only about riding horses. Also could be suitable places near the forest or in some empty fields full of flowers.

Your partner will always be impressed by the oldest idea about organizing romantic dinner near the candle lights. It sounds very classical but believe me it is only up to you to make it special find out what he or she doesnt like about food and learn couple of recipes that you can make on your own. This realy wont cause you any problems because there are lots of information about cooking and serving table. If you are a guy make sure that she will come earlier and notice you cooking. It would be even more impressive than already served table.

Everyone likes going to the zoo and it would realy ensure you very romantic trip that you can always choose instead of simple going for a walk. All those animals and nature get people close together and eliminate stress. Such an interesting way of spending time together wont cost you a lot but such an evening will be memorable and pithy.

You would never delude yourself with inviting your date to a museum, ancient places of your town, castles, galeries or some cultural festivals. It even could help to know a lot about your partner, because such places oblige people to talk about peculiar things and shows his/her attitude to the world.


Finally, no matter where you go always use your imagination fly a kite, play hide and seek or paint fight, dance in the rain, draw one another or something.

by: Rugile Kiguolyte

Sunday, December 13, 2009

Nucleic Acid Biochemistry Articles

Electronic Structure Of DNA Revealed For First Time


Utilizing a technique that combines low temperature measurements and theoretical calculations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem scientists and others have revealed for the first time the electronic structure of single DNA molecules.

The knowledge of the electronic properties of DNA is an important issue in many scientific areas from biochemistry to nanotechnology -- for example in the study of DNA damage by ultraviolet radiation that may cause the generation of free radicals and genetic mutations. In those cases, DNA repair occurs spontaneously via an electronic charge transfer along the DNA helix that restores the damaged molecular bonds.

In nano-bioelectronics, which is the advanced research field devoted to the study of biological molecules (to produce electrical nanocircuits, for example), it has been suggested that DNA, or its derivatives, may become used as possible conducting molecular wires in the realization of molecular computing networks which are smaller and more efficient than those produced today with silicon technology.

The knowledge that has been acquired in this project, say the researchers, may also be relevant for current attempts to develop new sophisticated, reliable, faster and cheaper ways to decode the sequence of human DNA.

In their work, the researchers were able to decode the electronic structure of DNA and to understand how the electrons distribute into the various parts of the double helix, a result that has been pursued by scientists for many years, but was previously hindered by technical problems.

Experimental and theoretical scientists worked with long and homogeneous DNA molecules at minus 195 degrees Celsius, using a scanning tunneling microscope (STM) to measure the current that passes across a molecule deposited on a gold substrate.

Then, by means of theoretical calculations based on the solution of quantum equations, the electronic structure of DNA corresponding to the measured current has been obtained. These results also suggest an identification of the parts of the double helix that contribute to the charge flow along the molecule.

The research, published in the journal Nature Materials, is a result of an international collaboration. The research was conducted by Errez Shapir and coordinated by Dr. Danny Porath at the Department of Physical Chemistry and Center for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at the Hebrew University and by Dr. Rosa Di Felice at the S3 Center of INFM-CNR in Modena, Italy. Also collaborating in the project were Prof. Alexander Kotlyar at Tel Aviv University, who synthesized the molecules, the CINECA supercomputing center in Italy, and Prof. Gianaurelio Cuniberti at the University of Regensburg, Germany.

Hebrew University of Jerusalem. March 2008.


Nucleic Acid Biochemistry Articles

Peptide nucleic acid–DNA duplexes: Long range hole migration from an internally linked anthraquinone

Bruce Armitage, Danith Ly, Troels Koch, Henrik Frydenlund, Henrik Ørum, Hans G. Batz, and Gary B. Schuster

PNAS November 11, 1997 vol. 94 no. 23 12320-12325

Abstract

The discovery that peptide nucleic acids (PNA) mimic DNA and RNA by forming complementary duplex structures following Watson–Crick base pairing rules opens fields in biochemistry, diagnostics, and medicine for exploration. Progress requires the development of modified PNA duplexes having unique and well defined properties. We find that anthraquinone groups bound to internal positions of a PNA oligomer intercalate in the PNA–DNA hybrid. Their irradiation with near-UV light leads to electron transfer and oxidative damage at remote GG doublets on the complementary DNA strand. This behavior mimics that observed in related DNA duplexes and provides the first evidence for long range electron (hole) transport in PNA–DNA hybrid. Analysis of the mechanism for electron transport supports hole hopping.

Peptide nucleic acid (PNA) oligomers are DNA/RNA analogs (see Fig. 1) in which the natural sugar–phosphate backbone is replaced by a synthetic peptide backbone (1). PNA oligomers that contain purine and pyrimidine nucleobases hybridize with complementary DNA and RNA strands to form right-handed, double-helical complexes according to the Watson–Crick rules of hydrogen bond-mediated base pair formation (2). Although much has been learned about the structural (3) and thermodynamic (4) factors involved in hybridization, little is known about the chemical reactivity of PNA/DNA hybrids. It is crucial to understand how PNA/DNA hybrids mimic the reactions and functions of duplex DNA. Of immediate importance for their application as clinical diagnostic agents is investigation of the conductivity of DNA and its PNA analogs (5, 6).

DNA must balance the dual requirements of chemical stability and ease of transcription and replication (7). It is clear that DNA is far from inert toward a variety of different reactive species, particularly oxidizing agents. Oxidative damage to DNA produced by normal metabolism, deep-UV laser irradiation (8), gamma rays (9), or pulse radiolysis (10) accumulates at guanine residues, an effect attributed to one-dimensional migration of a radical cation (“hole”) along the DNA helix (11). Both the low oxidation potential and reactivity of the guanine radical cation contribute to the effectiveness of guanine as a trap for the migrating hole. Because guanine lesions may be the major cause of mutations (12), intense attention is focused on understanding the conductivity properties of DNA to elucidate the mechanisms by which migration of oxidative damage occurs (13). In this regard, the recent reports by Barton and coworkers are particularly important (14, 15). They describe a system consisting of a rhodium complex that is covalently linked to one end of a DNA duplex. Irradiation caused damage to the DNA more than 30 Å from where the complex was presumed to intercalate. This observation opens up exciting opportunities to study the factors that control hole migration in nucleic acids.

Photosensitizers often react with nucleic acids by single electron transfer to oxidize a base. Recent findings reveal that the light-induced reactions of a photosensitizer bound to duplex DNA by intercalation frequently generate alkali-dependent cleavage sites selectively at the 5′-G of G-purine doublets, with a strong preference for GG steps. These photosensitizers include substituted anthraquinones (16, 17), naphthalimides (18, 19), a rhodium metal complex (14), and riboflavin (20). Breslin and Schuster (17) demonstrated unambiguously that GG-selective, photoinduced damage of DNA arises by an electron transfer pathway from an intercalated anthraquinone. Time-resolved spectroscopy reveals that the excited state of the quinone accepts an electron from a base in the DNA within 20 ps of excitation (21). The base radical cation (hole) can either recombine with the electron, be trapped by reaction with water and/or oxygen, or migrate along the DNA helix to the lowest oxidation potential sites that serve as traps (22, 23).

We prepared a series of PNA oligomers with anthraquinone derivatives (AQ) covalently linked to internal positions. The ability of the quinone to photosensitize DNA damage by electron transfer when bound to the duplex by intercalation suggested it could serve a similar role in PNA-containing duplexes. The inability of common intercalators to bind to PNA (24) required that the quinone chromophore be covalently linked to the PNA backbone. The facile modification of PNA at internal residues as well as the superior hybridization properties of PNA oligomers offer distinct advantages relative to synthesis of modified DNA oligomers. Irradiation of the anthraquinone in the hybrid duplex leads to long distance hole migration and damage at GG sites in the DNA strand. Additional experiments reveal the mechanism for hole migration by its directional preference in the stacked base pairs of a PNA–DNA hybrid duplex.

Radiolabeling of DNA.

DNA oligomers, including those with 8-OxoG and abasic modifications, were purchased from Midland Certified Reagent (Midland, Texas) and were used as received. DNA oligomers were labeled at the 5′ terminus using [γ-32P]-ATP and T4 polynucleotide kinase, according to standard procedures. The end-labeled DNA was purified by electrophoresis through a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. The DNA band was excised from the gel, eluted overnight, and ethanol-precipitated.

Photocleavage Experiments.

In a typical experiment, PNA–DNA hybrids were formed by mixing together in a microcentrifuge tube PNA and unlabeled DNA (5 μM each) with 40,000-cpm labeled DNA in 200 μl of sodium phosphate buffer (10 mM phosphate, pH 7.0). The mixture was heated to 90°C for 2 min, then allowed to cool to room temperature over a period of 1 h. Two 10-μl aliquots were removed from the sample and kept in the dark, while the remainder was irradiated in a Rayonet Photoreactor (Southern New England Ultraviolet Company, Bransford, CT) equipped with eight lamps (λ = 350 nm). The sample tube was suspended from a rotating platform, and cooling air was supplied by a fan in the bottom of the unit. At the desired times, 2 × 10-μl aliquots were removed and kept in the dark. After irradiation, the DNA was precipitated with ethanol and dried. One tube from each set of aliquots was then incubated in 1 M piperidine at 90°C for 30 min. After evaporation of the piperidine and drying, all samples were suspended in denaturing loading buffer, then loaded onto a 20% denaturing polyacrylamide gel. Autoradiography was used to detect cleavage products.

Quantum Yield Determination.

A 40-μM sample of the PNA-2/DNA-3 hybrid duplex (Tm = 51°C) was prepared from stoichiometric amounts of each strand in 10 mM sodium phosphate buffer by heating the solution to 90°C for 5 min and then cooling it slowly (5 h) to room temperature. The sample was irradiated at 350 nm for 1 h in a calibrated Rayonet reactor equipped with eight 15-W lamps (light flux = 2.6 × 10−8 Eins/min⋅cm2). The samples were treated with piperidine (90°C for 30 min) and 5′-dephosphorylated with bacterial alkaline phosphatase. The 5′-AAT-3′ and 5′-GAAT-3′ fragments resulting from cleavage at the GG step of the DNA strand were separated and quantified by HPLC on a Rainin Microsorb-MV C18 column (Rainin Instruments) with an acetonitrile/water/ammonium acetate mobile phase. The fragments were identified by comparison with authentic samples independently prepared.

The Structure of PNA Conjugates.

PNA oligomers were synthesized from N-Boc protected (2-aminoethyl)glycine monomers (25). The AQ-containing monomers are shown in Fig. 2. In AQ1, the anthraquinone group is linked to the peptide backbone by a single amide bond whereas for AQ2 there is an intervening glycine group between the quinone and backbone. A third monomer (Ac, used in control experiments) has an acetyl group bound to the backbone nitrogen atom of the (2-aminoethyl)glycine. The synthetic details and characterization of these compounds and the oligomers described below are reported elsewhere (unpublished work).

The PNA–AQ monomers were incorporated into 19-base oligomers (Fig. 3). The quinones are at the central position of PNA-1, equidistant from two CC sequences (sites B and C), with a third CC sequence (site A) two bases beyond site B. Hybridization of the PNA-1 with its complementary DNA-1Z oligomers gives duplexes with three GG sites to act as traps of a migrating radical cation. Placement of the quinone at the center of the duplex permits study of both the distance and directional dependence of hole migration.

A model of a PNA–DNA duplex containing an intercalated, covalently linked AQ1 group was built in sybyl 6.0 (Tripos Associates, St. Louis) using the coordinates for a PNA–DNA structure determined using NMR spectroscopy by Erikkson and Nielsen (27). One of the internal base pairs of the duplex was removed by excision of the PNA and DNA bases. The AQ carboxamide was then linked to the PNA backbone in place of the nucleobase while the DNA base was replaced by a hydrogen atom to create an abasic site. Even though this structure was not subjected to energy minimization, it clearly showed that there is space within the helix to accommodate the intercalated AQ group. This result and other experiments including thermal denaturation and phosphorescence quenching are consistent with an intercalated conformation of the AQ and are reported in detail elsewhere (unpublished work).

Light Causes Long Range DNA Damage.

The irradiation of AQs intercalated in duplex DNA gives efficient, piperidine-requiring strand cleavage selectively at GG sites by an electron transfer mechanism (16, 17). The base sequence in PNA-1/DNA-1X was specifically designed to probe for the corresponding reaction in PNA/DNA hybrids and to examine its mechanism. DNA-1X was labeled at its 5′ terminus with 32P by standard methods (28) and hybridized with the complementary PNA oligomers. Irradiation of the PNA-1(AQ1)/DNA-1X hybrid at 350 nm lead to piperidine-requiring DNA strand cleavage at the three GG sites (Fig. 4, lane 8). Cleavage at the 3′-G is favored for site A whereas the 5′-G is favored at site B (Fig. 3); cleavage occurs with equal efficiency at each G of site C. DNA strand cleavage also is observed at the abasic residue directly opposite the AQ. The pattern of cleavage bands is identical for the PNA-1(AQ2) hybrid (Fig. 4, lane 12) although the efficiency is lower. Control experiments with PNA-1(Ac), which lacks the quinone group, show essentially no cleavage of the DNA strand at any site (Fig. 4, lanes 1–4).

Additional control experiments show that cleavage of the DNA strand results from an intramolecular reaction initiated by excitation of the quinone in the hybrid duplex. In the photocleavage experiment described above, the PNA and labeled DNA were hybridized in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of unlabeled DNA-1X (relative to PNA-1). This ensures that all of the PNA will be hybridized during the experiment, with some fraction of the hybrids containing labeled DNA-1X strands. Hybridization of PNA-1(AQ1) with labeled DNA-1X and with a 10-fold excess of unlabeled DNA-1X strongly inhibits cleavage of the labeled DNA because the fraction of PNA-1(AQ1) that is hybridized to labeled DNA-1X is 10-fold lower. However, hybridization in the presence of a stoichiometric amount of unlabeled complementary DNA and a 9-fold excess of noncomplementary single-stranded DNA has no effect on the cleavage of the labeled DNA. (The presence of a stoichiometric amount of complementary, unlabeled DNA in the latter case ensures that the PNA is hybridized while maintaining the concentration of unhybridized DNA.) The lack of inhibition in this experiment demonstrates that cleavage is not mediated by a freely diffusing intermediate because the excess of single-stranded, unlabeled DNA should effectively inhibit such a process. Finally, cleavage is still observed when excess unlabeled DNA-1X is added after hybridization with labeled DNA, demonstrating the kinetic stability of the PNA(AQ)–DNA hybrids studied in these experiments.

Selective cleavage of DNA at guanine has been observed in reactions initiated by 1-electron oxidation and by reaction of singlet oxygen (1O2) (29). The G-selective cleavage of the PNA–DNA hybrid cannot be caused by freely diffusing 1O2, but a recent report raises the possibility of one-dimensional intramolecular diffusion of 1O2 in a groove of duplex DNA (30), and this could account for the long range cleavage that is observed. However, this path is unlikely in the present case because the lifetime of the requisite AQ triplet is shortened by electron transfer quenching. Additional control experiments were performed that compare the cleavage of PNA-1(AQ1)–DNA hybrids caused by irradiation of methylene blue, a known 1O2 generator (31), with direct irradiation of the quinone in the hybrid duplex. Inspection of Fig. 5 shows cleavage of DNA upon irradiation of methylene blue that is enhanced significantly when D2O is substituted for H2O (compare Fig. 5, lanes 4 and 2), proving that the cleavage in this case is caused by reaction with 1O2 generated by excited methylene blue (32). No effect of D2O is seen for the quinone-initiated cleavage (data not shown). It is important to note that the cleavage pattern due to the reaction of 1O2 is significantly different from that seen for irradiation of the quinone. In particular, densitometric analysis indicates that the ratio of cleavage of the 5′-G to the 3′-G at site A is 1.6 for 1O2 and 0.7 for the AQ-initiated reaction. Clearly, the long range G-selective cleavage reaction of the PNA–DNA hybrid duplex cannot involve 1O2 but must occur by electron transfer to generate a base radical cation and long distance migration of the hole as has been previously proposed for anthraquinones in duplex DNA.

Mechanistic interpretation of reactions with extraordinarily low quantum yields is risky because minor structural isomers or impurities can confound the analysis. The quantum yields for cleavage at the GG step (ΦGG) by photonucleases range from 1.4% for an intercalated AQ derivative (with a 10-fold preference for cleavage at the 5′-G) (16) to 0.000005% reported for a Rh(phi)2DMB+3 complex linked covalently to a 5′ terminus of duplex DNA and presumed to be intercalated (14). We determined ΦGG in a PNA–DNA hybrid duplex by an HPLC technique.

The PNA-2(AQ1)/DNA-3 hybrid duplex (Fig. 3) was designed for measurement of ΦGG. Cleavage at the 5′-G gives, after 5′-dephosphorylation, 5′-GAAT-3′, and cleavage at the 3′-G gives 5′-AAT-3′. These oligonucleotides are separated easily and quantified by reversed phase HPLC. In air-saturated solution, the ΦGG for PNA-2(AQ1)/DNA-3 is 0.17%. The ratio of 5′ to 3′ G cleavage is 1:3, a preference opposite to that seen in duplex DNA. Clearly, the efficiency of radical cation generation, migration, and conversion to a piperidine-cleavable lesion is relatively high in the quinone-containing hybrid PNA–DNA duplex.

The 3′-G at site A of the PNA-1(AQ1)/DNA-1X hybrid is more than 25 Å from the AQ group, and the short linkage between the quinone and the PNA backbone prohibits direct contact between the donor (G) and acceptor (AQ), yet cleavage is observed at this and other remote sites within the duplex. One model for long range oxidative damage involves instantaneous delocalization of the radical cation, i.e., the electron is transferred directly from the GG site to the excited state photosensitizer. Selective GG cleavage in such a process would reflect a higher radical cation density at these most easily oxidized sites. An alternative mechanism postulates oxidation of a base at a distinct position (e.g., adjacent to the photosensitizer) followed by migration of the radical cation by sequential electron transfers, i.e., hole-hopping. In this model, the hole will be distributed among the various low oxidation potential sites only if the rate of hopping is faster than the rate of irreversible chemical reaction (e.g., addition of water or O2 to the radical cation) at a particular site. The data presented thus far cannot distinguish between these two mechanistic models.

A Deep Trap Reveals the Mechanism.

Introduction of a low oxidation potential trap in the hybrid duplex allows a clear test of the mechanism for migration of oxidative damage. In particular, the central position of the AQ acceptor between two GG reaction sites (as opposed to the linkage of the photosensitizer to the duplex terminus) allows the placement of a trap so that instantaneous delocalization of the hole into the trap can be distinguished from its arrival at the trap by a series of hops. The delocalization model predicts inhibition of cleavage at all GG sites by the trap because the duplex is considered to be one continuous orbital system. Instantaneous connection of the hole and the trap decreases the likelihood of reaction at all other sites. On the other hand, migration by the hopping mechanism will exhibit a distinct directional preference for cleavage inhibition because the hole cannot “know” of the trap’s existence until it hops into it.

The ideal trap is a modified base that does not distort the structure of the PNA–DNA duplex and that has an oxidation potential significantly below that of the GG sequence. We selected the guanine derivative 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-OxoG; Fig. 3) as the trap on this basis. This modified base is often detected as a byproduct of oxidative damage (14, 20, 23, 31, 33–36). Although structural information is not available for PNA-containing duplexes, Williams and coworkers (37) recently determined the structure of a DNA duplex having an 8-OxoG substitution by x-ray crystallography and found that the oxidized base caused little perturbation. We found that substitution of an 8-OxoG for G on DNA in a PNA/DNA hybrid lowers the melting temperature of the duplex only 1°C. Foote and Sheu (36) report that the oxidation potential of 8-OxoG is 0.4–0.5 V below that of guanosine (as their t-butyldimethylsilyl-protected nucleoside derivatives). Considering that the difference in oxidation potential between G and A is only ≈0.1 V (38), 8-OxoG should provide a deep trap for holes in the PNA/DNA hybrid.

Photoinduced cleavage of the PNA-1(AQ1)/DNA-1T hybrid yields a cleavage pattern nearly identical to that observed for DNA-1X (Fig. 6, lane 4; compare with Fig. 4, lane 8). DNA-2 is analogous to DNA-1T except that 8-OxoG is substituted for G at site B. Irradiation of the PNA-1(AQ1)/DNA-2 hybrid shows significantly enhanced cleavage at site B, but the more dramatic effect is observed at site A, where cleavage is almost completely inhibited (lane 10). The 8-OxoG acts as a barrier to cleavage at this distal GG site. It is important to note that 8-OxoG substitution has no effect on cleavage at site C, which is located in the opposite direction from the trap. Clearly, the hole does not sense the presence of the 8-OxoG trap when the selection of migration direction occurs. Consequently, the hole cannot be in electronic contact with the trap as is required by the instantaneous delocalization model. These findings provide evidence that radical cations in a PNA–DNA duplex migrate by a discrete hopping mechanism.


Friday, November 20, 2009

Increasing the size of Windows screen Text Size

If the text on your screen is too small for easy reading, you can increase the size of the fonts. This option enables you to enlarge the fonts used in window headers, icon labels, and menus.

  • Right click on any empty area of Windows Desktop and select Properties. Desktop Display Properties
  • Click on the Appearance tab.
  • in Font size drop down box, choose Large Fonts or Extra Large Fonts. change Windows font Size
  • Click the OK button and you are done.

Note: The font size options are based on the current visual style, and color scheme. For some styles or schemes, you may only have one font size option.

Thursday, October 22, 2009

Don’t Duck Around This Player

Don’t Duck Around This Player
Quack Quack! Ok I won’t kid around this time, but I think Mac Funamizu has matured pretty much in his design sensibilities. The CD player is called Quackie, but the concept looks decent enough for the tweens who endorse stuff like the Mickey Mouse MP3 players. Quackie is thus: There’s a round body that rolls and a black speaker. The speaker is attached to the body at the axis and it rolls around the body. Simple functions of play/stop/next/back and volume up/down are included.

To pump up the volume, you roll the body so that the “beak” opens up; shutting the beak powers-off the system. Click the black speaker once to skip to the next song and click it thrice to go back.



Monday, September 21, 2009

Penis Cancer

Cancer of the penis is extremely rare in the United States, affecting only about 1,500 men each year, or about 1 in every 100,000 men. The penile cancer rate is much higher among men in India and some South American countries, where circumcision at birth is not as common as in the United States.

The risks for penile cancer include:

Age: Most cases are seen in men aged 50 to 70, although nearly a third of cases occur in men under 50.
Smoking: Men who either chew or smoke tobacco are more at risk for penile cancer.
Human Papillomavirus (HPV): This sexually transmitted disease has more than a dozen subtypes. HPV 16 and HPV 18 are most frequently linked to penile cancer.
Lack of circumcision at birth: Studies have shown that penile cancer rates are higher in populations where circumcision is done later or not at all.
Phimosis: A condition in which it's difficult to pull back the foreskin, which can lead to the buildup of body oils, bacteria and other debris known as smegma.

Symptoms

Penile cancer starts on the glans (head) or tip of the penis and spreads from there. Some men may have obvious symptoms in the early stages, while others may not have any symptoms until the disease has advanced. Although it may not mean cancer, any abnormalities of the penis should be reported to your doctor or health care provider as soon as possible.

Unfortunately, many men are reluctant to discuss these issues with their physician, and may delay seeking treatment until the disease is advanced and then harder to treat.

Men who have retained their foreskin need to examine the area underneath the foreskin regularly, and keep the area clean to lower their risk. Penile cancer symptoms may include:

* A wart-like growth or lesion
* An open sore that won’t heal
* A reddish rash
* Persistent, smelly discharge under the foreskin


Treatment

Treating penile cancer depends on the stage of disease. Surgery is the most common form of therapy, but laser therapy and radiation can be used for smaller tumors. Surgery to remove all or part of the penis is called penectomy.

Partial penectomy is a frequently-used form of therapy. The tumor is removed along with a margin of normal tissue. Historically, a 2-cm margin was obtained in all cases, but more recent data suggest that such wide margins may not be necessary. Surgeons are currently attempting to spare as much of the glans (head) and shaft as possible to retain urinary and sexual function.

Total penectomy involves removal of the entire penis for large tumors. The surgeon reroutes the urethra behind the testicles and a urethrostomy (hole) is created so the patient can urinate. Penile reconstruction surgery using a flap of skin from the forearm to create a new penis has been done, but the procedure is not done very often.

For very small superficial tumors, penile cancer may be treated with a laser beam that destroys the tumor, radiation therapy and in some cases, a cream containing the chemotherapy drug fluorouracil applied to the skin. These treatments offer the best opportunity to spare the glans penis and sexual function. That is why it is important to find penile tumors early by seeking immediate medical attention for any abnormalities on the penis.